The Ramirez decision established limits to the affirmative use of PMQ testimony (e.g., in support of a motion for summary judgment). PMQs are required, for discovery purposes, to learn about matters from other sources if they do not have personal knowledge. Yet what a PMQ learns from other sources is hearsay, and likely not admissible. Does this mean everything good a PMQ has to say is inadmissible, but everything bad will be admitted as a party admission? Attend this webinar and find out.

Presented by:
Don Willenburg, Esq., Partner and Chair Appellate Practice Group | Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

Ayushi Neogi, Esq., Associate | Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani

Register Here